Who Made Autism?
Tracing the Complex History Behind Autism's Recognition
The story of autism is a journey through scientific discovery, shifting perceptions, and evolving diagnostic frameworks. From early descriptions to modern understanding, numerous figures and studies have shaped how society perceives this spectrum of neurodevelopmental differences. This article explores who contributed to the creation of autism's modern narrative and how these milestones continue to influence diagnosis, treatment, and societal attitudes today.
Early Pioneers and Historical Roots of Autism
What are the historical origins and development of autism as a diagnosis?
The history of autism as a formal diagnosis stretches back centuries, marked by early descriptions that laid the groundwork for modern understanding. One of the earliest known cases was in 1747, with Hugh Blair of Borgue, often considered the first well-documented person with behavioral traits that resemble autism today. This case was remarkable because it detailed social withdrawal and unusual behaviors long before autism was recognized scientifically.
In 1911, Eugen Bleuler first used the term 'autism' in a medical context. Originally, Bleuler associated it with schizophrenia, describing it as a symptom involving a detachment from reality. He used the word to characterize a kind of withdrawal from the external world, which was part of his broader theory of schizophrenia.
The early 20th century also saw detailed observational descriptions of children with social and behavioral difficulties. In 1925, child psychiatrist Grunya Sukhareva provided a comprehensive description of traits that closely align with what we now recognize as autism. Her work focused on children with specific interests, talents, and behaviors such as repetitive language and sensory sensitivities. Despite her pioneering efforts, her studies were overlooked in Western psychiatry for many decades, only gaining recognition much later.
During this period, the prevailing view was that autism was related to schizophrenia or caused by psychiatric factors. However, this perspective started to change through the work of clinicians like Leo Kanner. In 1943, Kanner published a landmark paper describing 11 children with a pattern of social withdrawal, delayed speech, and insistence on sameness. His research marked the first clear distinction of autism as a unique and developmental condition, separate from mental illness.
Complementing Kanner’s work, Hans Asperger, in 1944, observed boys with social difficulties, circumscribed interests, and good language skills. His descriptions contributed significantly to the understanding of a milder form of autism, later known as Asperger syndrome. Unfortunately, due to the timing of his publication and World War II, Asperger’s findings were not widely recognized until decades later.
As research progressed through the mid-to-late 20th century, the understanding of autism evolved from being seen as a rare and separate condition to a broader spectrum. The development of diagnostic manuals like the DSM and ICD—the International Classification of Diseases—formalized criteria, moving away from psychiatry's early notions of autism as a symptom of schizophrenia.
By the 1980s and 1990s, autism was increasingly acknowledged as a neurodevelopmental disorder involving social, communication, and behavioral challenges. The 1994 DSM-IV introduced more refined criteria for autism, which continued to evolve leading to the 2013 DSM-5's consolidation of different autism-related diagnoses under the umbrella term "autism spectrum disorder".
Today, the understanding of autism continues to grow through ongoing research into its genetics, neural mechanisms, and environmental factors, marking a significant shift from early perceptions rooted in psychodynamic and psychiatric theories to a comprehensive view of autism as a diverse spectrum of neurodevelopmental differences.
Key Researchers: From Kanner to Asperger and Sukhareva
Who are key figures in the discovery and understanding of autism?
The history of autism research is marked by contributions from several pioneering psychologists and psychiatrists. Leo Kanner, in 1943, was the first to define "early infantile autism," describing children who exhibited social withdrawal, delayed speech, and repetitive behaviors. His detailed case studies distinguished autism as a unique developmental disorder.
A year later, in 1944, Hans Asperger identified a group of boys with similar social difficulties and narrow interests, but with relatively good language skills. Asperger’s work laid the foundation for what is now known as Asperger syndrome, part of the autism spectrum.
Long before Kanner and Asperger, Grunya Sukhareva in 1925 provided a comprehensive description of children with traits that align with modern autism, including obsessive interests, sensory sensitivities, and atypical behaviors. Despite her early work, her findings were overlooked for many years, but they significantly predate the more famous early descriptions.
In the later decades, especially during the 1960s and 70s, researchers like Michael Rutter and Bernard Rimland expanded understanding of autism. Rutter’s research emphasized deficits in social cognition, and Rimland challenged prevailing theories blaming parenting, focusing instead on biological and neurodevelopmental factors.
Their collective work transformed autism from a misunderstood anomaly into a recognized neurodevelopmental spectrum. The increased scientific clarity underscored the importance of behavioral observation and neurobiological research, leading to clearer diagnostic criteria and classification.
This progression of discoveries helped shift mental health legislation, diagnostic tools, and public awareness, positioning autism as a distinct condition with a spectrum of presentations rather than a single, static disorder.
Evolution of Diagnostic and Classification Systems
How has the classification and diagnosis of autism changed over time?
Initially, autism was thought to be closely tied to childhood schizophrenia, with Eugen Bleuler first describing it in 1911 as a symptom of severe mental disorder. In the 1940s, Leo Kanner’s groundbreaking work in 1943 marked the first detailed clinical description of what he called infantile autism, highlighting social withdrawal, language delays, and repetitive behaviors.
During the 1960s and 1970s, the focus shifted towards observable behaviors, as epidemiological studies by Victor Lotter and others used behavior and language deficits to define autism, moving away from earlier speculations about hallucinations or fantasy. This epoch signaled a transition from a psychoanalytic to a more scientific approach involving behavior analysis.
In 1980, autism was formally recognized as a distinct diagnosis with inclusion in the DSM-III, which outlined specific criteria emphasizing early onset, social impairment, and restricted repetitive behaviors. Subcategories like Asperger’s syndrome and Rett syndrome existed separately for some time, but the criteria gradually became more refined.
A significant change came with DSM-5 in 2013, which combined previous autism diagnoses under the umbrella term Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This updated framework adopted a dimensional approach, acknowledging the spectrum of severity and phenotypic variability. It eliminated distinct subcategories, such as Asperger’s syndrome, integrating them into a unified spectrum.
These developments reflect ongoing research and cultural shifts, recognizing autism’s complex neurodevelopmental nature. The move from categorical diagnoses to spectra has improved diagnostic consistency, enabled personalized assessments, and increased awareness about autism’s diversity.
Today, clinicians use standardized tools like the ADOS-2 and SRS-2 to evaluate severity and profile of autism symptoms. Diagnosis typically occurs in early childhood, around ages 2-3, with early intervention improving outcomes. The evolving classification system has also influenced public awareness, policy making, and research priorities, fostering a more nuanced understanding of autism’s multifaceted presentation.
Prevalence Studies and Changing Perspectives
The understanding of how common autism is has evolved significantly over decades. In 1966, Victor Lotter conducted one of the earliest epidemiological studies in Britain, revealing a prevalence rate of approximately 4.5 children per 10,000. This low figure reflected the limited awareness and narrower diagnostic criteria at the time.
By 1979, research by Lorna Wing and Judith Gould broadened the scope, observing children with special needs and identifying a prevalence of about 20 per 10,000 within this group. Their findings marked an early recognition of the broader autism spectrum, though the general population figures remained low.
Entering the 2000s, prevalence estimates increased markedly. A notable British study in 2006 reported about 116 in 10,000 children on the autism spectrum, a substantial rise from earlier reports. Similarly, a 2007 survey in the UK found that roughly 1% of the population was autistic. These figures reflect a wider diagnostic net, increased awareness, and improved screening tools.
International studies from 2008 to 2012 show rates varying from about 1 in 50 to 1 in 88 children. Such variation depends on regional differences, study methodologies, and awareness levels.
The upward trend in reported prevalence is largely due to changes in diagnostic criteria, more comprehensive screening, and greater awareness of autism. As understanding deepened, more individuals who might have been previously undiagnosed are now identified. This does not necessarily mean that the actual incidence of autism has increased but that our ability to detect it has improved over time.
| Year | Prevalence Estimate | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 1966 | 4.5 per 10,000 | Early epidemiology |
| 1979 | 20 per 10,000 | Broader diagnosis within needs groups |
| 2006 | 116 per 10,000 | Larger population surveys |
| 2007 | ~1% of population | UK population-wide estimate |
| 2008-2012 | 1 in 50 to 1 in 88 | International variation |
These shifts highlight the impact of evolving diagnostic frameworks and increased societal awareness on prevalence figures, shaping our current understanding of autism as a spectrum affecting many more individuals than previously recognized.
From Rare Condition to Spectrum: Changing Societal Perceptions
How has societal perception of autism changed throughout history?
Societal views of autism have undergone a remarkable transformation over the past century. Initially, autism was considered a rare and obscure developmental disorder, often misunderstood and erroneously linked to severe mental illnesses like schizophrenia. In the early 20th century, notable figures such as Eugen Bleuler described autism as a symptom of schizophrenia, which contributed to stigmatization.
During the 1940s, Leo Kanner and Hans Asperger identified autism as a distinct condition. Kanner described a syndrome involving social withdrawal, communication difficulties, and repetitive behaviors, while Asperger observed children who had social challenges but relatively preserved language skills. These discoveries began shifting perceptions from viewing autism as a rare mental illness to recognizing it as a unique neurodevelopmental aspect of human diversity.
Despite these scientific advances, misconceptions persisted, notably the 'refrigerator mother' theory of the 1950s and 1960s. This unfounded idea falsely blamed cold, distant parenting for causing autism, which added shame to families affected by the condition and hindered understanding.
In recent decades, increased advocacy and public awareness efforts have fostered more acceptance and inclusivity. The neurodiversity movement emphasizes viewing autism as a natural variation in human neurology rather than a disease to be cured. Campaigns promoting autism acceptance focus on embracing differences, fostering support, and dismantling stigma.
Today, society increasingly recognizes the importance of respecting autistic individuals’ distinct perspectives. Symbols like the rainbow-colored puzzle piece and the color blue have been adopted to promote awareness and celebrate diversity.
Overall, the journey from seeing autism as a rare, misunderstood disorder to a broad spectrum encompassed by acceptance reflects societal growth towards inclusivity and acknowledgment of neurodiverse strengths and challenges.
Impact of Autism Research on Society and Policy
How has societal perception of autism changed throughout history?
Societal views of autism have undergone a profound transformation over the decades. Initially, autism was misunderstood and viewed as a rare mental disorder, often linked to unscientific theories such as the refrigerator mother hypothesis, which wrongly blamed distant parenting for causing the condition. During the mid-20th century, it was mostly seen as a severe developmental disturbance with limited understanding.
The discovery of Hans Asperger's work in 1944, describing children with high intelligence and specific social difficulties, started to broaden the perspective. However, it wasn't until research in the 1960s and 1970s provided clearer evidence that autism was a distinct neurodevelopmental condition that perceptions began to shift. The development and refinement of diagnostic tools, along with epidemiological studies indicating rising prevalence, raised awareness.
In recent years, the societal view has shifted from viewing autism as merely a set of deficits to recognizing it as a diverse spectrum. Advocacy organizations and public awareness campaigns emphasize acceptance, neurodiversity, and inclusion. Symbols like the puzzle piece and blue ribbons promote understanding and celebrate differences. Today, society increasingly sees autism as a natural variation within human diversity, moving away from stigma to a focus on support and empowerment.
The role of CDC and epidemiological tracking
Epidemiological tracking plays a vital role in understanding autism's prevalence and informing public policies. Since the 2000s, organizations like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have systematically monitored autism through initiatives such as the Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network. These efforts have revealed that prevalence varies internationally, with recent estimates suggesting around 1 in 50 to 1 in 88 children in various regions are affected.
Data from these studies help identify trends, disparities, and potential environmental or genetic factors influencing autism. They also guide resource allocation for healthcare, education, and support services. Public health agencies use this information to shape policies focused on early detection, intervention programs, and inclusive education.
Policy changes influenced by research findings
Research insights have driven significant policy changes at national and international levels. Recognition of autism as a spectrum disorder within diagnostic manuals like DSM-5 and ICD has redefined eligibility for services and accommodations, promoting a more individualized approach.
Governments have introduced laws mandating early screening and intervention, acknowledging that earlier diagnosis improves long-term outcomes. Policies now support funding for specialized healthcare, inclusive education, and employment initiatives for autistic individuals.
Improvement in early diagnosis and intervention
Advances in research have led to the development of reliable screening tools like the ADOS-2 and SRS-2, enabling earlier diagnosis typically around ages 2 to 3. Early detection allows for timely intervention, which can substantially improve social, communication, and adaptive skills.
Intervention strategies such as Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) are now standard and backed by scientific evidence, emphasizing skill development and behavioral support. The focus on early intervention aligns with research showing that enhanced outcomes are achievable with prompt, tailored approaches.
| Aspect | Development | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Public Awareness | Campaigns, symbols like puzzle pieces | Reduced stigma, greater acceptance |
| Monitoring | CDC surveys, epidemiological studies | Better understanding of prevalence |
| Policies | Law reforms, early screening mandates | Increased access to services |
| Interventions | Early screening tools, behavioral therapies | Improved developmental outcomes |
This ongoing cycle of research, awareness, and policy development continues to shape a society that is more informed, inclusive, and supportive of autistic individuals.
Genetics and Science: Unraveling Autism’s Biological Foundations
What is the estimated genetic contribution to autism spectrum disorder?
Research indicates that genetics play a major role in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Heritability estimates generally fall between 69% and 87%, depending on the specific study and methodology.
Twin studies provide compelling evidence of the strong genetic basis of autism. They show that monozygotic (identical) twins have a concordance rate of about 70-90%, meaning if one twin has autism, there is a very high chance the other does as well. In contrast, dizygotic (fraternal) twins have much lower concordance rates, around 10-30%, similar to the general population.
Family studies reinforce these findings. Siblings of children with autism are at a higher risk—about 10-20%—and this risk increases further in families with multiple affected members.
Modern genetic research focuses on identifying specific markers and mutations associated with ASD. Scientists are exploring gene variations, copy number variations (CNVs), and other genetic alterations that may contribute to autism.
Beyond genetics, environmental factors are recognized as influencing the risk and expression of ASD. However, the primary cause is believed to be the complex interplay between genetic predisposition and environmental influences.
In summary, current estimates underscore that genetic components are responsible for roughly 70-90% of autism’s manifestation, making it a highly heritable neurodevelopmental disorder influenced by multiple genes and environmental factors.
| Aspect | Details | Additional Insights |
|---|---|---|
| Heritability Estimates | 69-87% | Range varies by study and population |
| Twin Study Concordance | 70-90% for monozygotic, 10-30% for dizygotic | Indicates strong genetic influence |
| Family Risk | Siblings 10-20% risk, higher in multiplex families | Supports hereditary pattern |
| Focus of Current Research | Genes, mutations, CNVs | Aims to pinpoint specific genetic causes |
| Role of Environment | Modulating but not primary | Influences risk but genetics are underlying causative |
More Information
Search Query: Genetics and biological basis of autism
This robust body of evidence affirms that autism primarily stems from genetic factors. The ongoing research continues to uncover how specific genes and genetic mutations impact neural development, bringing us closer to precise diagnostics and potential targeted treatments.
The Role of Public Figures and Advocacy in Autism Awareness
How has societal perception of autism changed throughout history?
Societal views on autism have undergone profound changes over the decades. In the mid-20th century, autism was often misunderstood and stigmatized, seen as a rare and severe developmental disorder linked to psychological issues like cold parenting, notably the 'refrigerator mother' theory. Children with autism were frequently institutionalized, and autism was mistakenly associated with schizophrenia.
With pioneering research by Leo Kanner and Hans Asperger in the 1940s, autism began to be identified as a distinct neurodevelopmental condition. This understanding gradually shifted the perception from blame and shame to a recognition of its complex biological basis. The establishment of diagnostic criteria in the DSM and ICD from the 1980s onwards helped formalize autism as a spectrum of related conditions.
In recent years, advocacy efforts and public awareness campaigns have played a vital role in transforming societal attitudes. The visibility of autistic advocates like Temple Grandin, a renowned psychologist and author, has challenged stereotypes and showcased the talents and diversity within the autism community.
The importance of visibility and representation.
Visibility of autistic individuals in media and public life has fostered greater understanding and acceptance. Representation in TV shows, films, and public speaking engagements helps normalize autism and educates the public about the spectrum's diversity.
Advocates like Temple Grandin, who shares her experiences from an autistic perspective, have become influential symbols of diversity and capability. Their stories emphasize that autism is not solely a set of deficits but includes unique strengths and perspectives.
How advocacy has shaped public attitudes and policy.
Aut advocacy organizations have campaigned to improve education, healthcare, and employment opportunities for autistic people. Laws and policies favoring inclusion, early intervention, and support services have been enacted in many countries.
Increased media coverage and public discussions have driven funding for autism research and awareness initiatives. Movements advocating for neurodiversity promote the idea that neurological differences are natural variations, fostering respect and reducing stigma.
The impact of research, education, and media exposure.
Research advances, such as the understanding of autism as a spectrum and the genetic and environmental influences, support better interventions and support systems.
Educational programs and media coverage amplify this knowledge, reaching wider audiences and fostering acceptance. The use of symbols like the puzzle piece and the color blue in campaigns has become synonymous with autism awareness, symbolizing diversity and inclusion.
| Aspect | Impact | Notable Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Advocacy & Public Figures | Increased awareness & representation | Temple Grandin, Autism Self-Advocacy Network |
| Media Exposure | Greater societal understanding | Films like 'Rain Man', documentaries on autism |
| Policy & Education | Better support systems | Autism CARES Act, inclusive education standards |
| Cultural Symbols | Promoting acceptance | Puzzle piece, blue ribbon |
Through these efforts, society continues to move towards a more inclusive and supportive environment for autistic individuals, recognizing their independence, talents, and contributions.
The Scientific Turn: From Psychoanalytic to Neurobiological Perspectives
What scientific explanations and research milestones have contributed to understanding autism?
Autism was once misunderstood, with theories like the refrigerator mother hypothesis blaming cold parenting for the condition. This idea, popular from 1949 onward, suggested that distant mothers caused autism in their children, but it was later thoroughly debunked.
The turning point in autism research occurred with the shift to scientific, neurobiological explanations. In the 1960s and 1970s, researchers such as Ivar Rimland and Michael Rutter played pivotal roles in establishing autism as a distinct diagnosis, separate from schizophrenia. Their work emphasized observable behaviors and developmental patterns, moving away from psychoanalytic theories.
A major milestone was the development of the ‘theory of mind’ hypothesis, which conceptualized autism as a difficulty in understanding and attributing mental states to others. This model helped clarify social and communicative deficits characteristic of autism.
The first detailed descriptions of autism came from Leo Kanner in 1943, who observed children struggling with speech, social interactions, and repetitive behaviors. Around the same time, Hans Asperger described children with similar social difficulties but without speech delays—later called Asperger’s syndrome—broadening the autism spectrum concept.
Progress in diagnostic criteria further advanced psychological and medical understanding. The DSM-III in 1980 emphasized early onset, social challenges, and restricted behaviors as core features. It marked official recognition of autism as a separate condition, refining how clinicians identify it.
In the following decades, neurobiological research grew with the advent of advanced neuroimaging techniques, which revealed structural and functional differences in the brains of autistic individuals. Genetic research, including twin studies, demonstrated that autism is highly heritable, supporting a strong biological basis.
Additional tools like the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2) and Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS-2) helped professionals assess severity and phenotypes, leading to more personalized interventions.
The adoption of the DSM-5 in 2013 consolidated multiple diagnoses under the umbrella term Autism Spectrum Disorder, reflecting a spectrum of symptoms and severities rather than separate categories. This change reinforced the understanding of autism as a neurodevelopmental condition rooted in complex genetic and environmental factors.
| Research Area | Milestone | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Criteria | DSM-III adoption (1980) | Formal recognition and improved diagnosis |
| Behavioral understanding | 'Theory of mind' hypothesis | Clarified social deficits |
| Genetic studies | Twin studies confirming heritability | Demonstrated biological basis |
| Neuroimaging | Brain structure and function insights | Revealed neural underpinnings |
| Assessment tools | ADOS-2, SRS-2 | Enhanced severity assessment and profiling |
Today, autism research continues to explore genetic, neural, and environmental factors. These scientific milestones have transformed autism from a misunderstood condition to a well-characterized neurodevelopmental spectrum, guiding better diagnosis, intervention, and support.
Key Figures Who Challenged Prevailing Myths and Stereotypes
Who are key figures in the discovery and understanding of autism?
Several pioneering scientists have significantly shaped our knowledge of autism, challenging misconceptions along the way.
Leo Kanner, a psychiatrist, was the first to describe "early infantile autism" in 1943. His detailed observations highlighted social withdrawal, communication difficulties, and repetitive behaviors in children, laying the foundation for modern autism diagnosis.
Hans Asperger, working in Austria in 1944, studied children with social challenges and circumscribed interests. His work, which described boys with social difficulties but relatively good verbal skills, eventually led to the identification of Asperger syndrome. Despite initial oversight, Asperger's contributions became influential in understanding the autism spectrum.
Grunya Sukhareva, a child psychiatrist in Russia, published her comprehensive description of autistic traits in 1925. Her work emphasized interests, talents, and repetitive behaviors and is now recognized as an early and significant contribution to autism research, predating Kanner and Asperger.
In later decades, researchers like Michael Rutter and Bernard Rimland emphasized the biological and neurodevelopmental nature of autism. Their work moved the field away from faulty theories blaming parenting and instead supported the view of autism as a genetically influenced condition.
Furthermore, scientists such as Uta Frith and Simon Baron-Cohen have championed the understanding of autism as a cognitive and biological spectrum. Their research on theory of mind and empathizing versus systemizing has challenged outdated stereotypes, promoting greater acceptance.
How have these figures contributed to changing public perceptions?
Their collective efforts have refuted harmful myths like the refrigerator mother theory, which falsely blamed cold parenting for autism. Instead, a focus on genetic and neurobiological factors helped foster a more compassionate view.
Advocates inspired by these researchers promote neurodiversity—viewing autism as a natural variation of human neurology rather than a defect to be cured. This shift has supported increased acceptance, inclusion, and tailored support for autistic individuals.
Understanding the roles of these scientists highlights how research and advocacy continue to combat stereotypes and forge a more inclusive perspective on autism.
From Stigma to Acceptance: The Cultural Shift
How has societal perception of autism changed throughout history?
Initially, autism was seen as a rare and obscure developmental disorder, often linked to severe mental health issues and misunderstood as part of schizophrenia or as a result of poor parenting. During the mid-20th century, societal views were rooted in misconceptions, such as the now-debunked refrigerator mother theory, which blamed cold parenting for causing autism and led to shame and stigma for families.
Over time, groundbreaking research by Leo Kanner and Hans Asperger in the 1940s and 1940s shed light on autism as a distinct neurodevelopmental condition, highlighting the diversity of individuals on the spectrum. This scientific progress helped shift perceptions from viewing autistic individuals as fundamentally broken to recognizing their unique strengths and challenges.
The late 20th century saw further changes with the development of diagnostic tools and increased awareness. Advocacy groups and public figures began to promote understanding and acceptance, emphasizing neurodiversity—a perspective that sees neurological differences as natural variations rather than deficits.
Symbols like the puzzle piece and the Blue ESA (Emotional Support Animals) have become icons representing autism awareness and support. These symbols aim to foster a more inclusive view, focusing on acceptance and respect for individual differences.
Movements like neurodiversity advocate for recognizing autistic people’s rights, promoting inclusion in education, employment, and society at large. These efforts have helped transform societal attitudes from viewing autism solely as a disorder that needs cure to understanding it as a part of human diversity.
Today, the cultural perception continues to evolve, emphasizing acceptance, respect, and the celebration of autistic identities. Education, advocacy, and visibility have played crucial roles in reshaping attitudes, turning stigma into understanding and appreciation.
Reflecting on Autism's Legacy and Its Future
The history of autism is a testament to the power of scientific inquiry, advocacy, and societal change. From early pioneering figures to modern researchers and activists, understanding autism has evolved from misconceptions and stigma to recognition of its rich diversity as a neurodevelopmental spectrum. As research continues to uncover genetic and neurobiological foundations, society's perceptions are shifting towards acceptance, inclusion, and support. Who made autism? It is the collective effort of decades of scientists, advocates, and individuals who challenged stereotypes, advanced knowledge, and fostered a world more understanding of neurodiversity. The future of autism lies in continued research, compassionate policies, and embracing the unique perspectives autistic individuals bring to our communities.
References
- The history of autism - National Autistic Society
- History of autism - Wikipedia
- How autism became autism: The radical transformation of a central ...
- Historical Perspective - National Autism Center at May Institute
- The Diagnosis of Autism: From Kanner to DSM-III to DSM-5 and ...
- When did autism become a diagnosis? | Oxford CBT
- The History of Autism
- Signs of autism in adults - NHS
- Signs of autism - NHS
- Autism - NHS